Section 1-5 - Circular Motion - up to dat in Oct 3rd.

Centripetal Acceleration
Applications & Examples of Centripetal Acceleration
Correlation to your Textbook

Centripetal Acceleration

The second half of Newton's First Law of Motion says that an object will maintain a constant velocity unless acted on by a force.  So, when we see an object moving along a circular path, even at constant speed, we know that there is a force acting on it: changing velocity (direction) means that there is an acceleration, which means (Second Law) that there is a force.

Let's consider a ball whirled around on the end of a string (ignore any gravity for now).  What force acts on the ball to keep it moving in a circle?


If that force were removed, what would be the subsequent motion of the ball?

Because this force acts on the ball toward the centre of the circle (see below), it is sometimes referred to as a centripetal force (centripetal = 'seeking the centre').  However, in my experience, this causes a great deal of confusion in many students who count the centripetal force as a separate force; better to say that 'a force acts centripetally.'

Let's look at this situation in more detail.  Let an object move at some speed around a circular path.  Consider a particular point in the object's path, where the velocity vector v is then tangent to the circle.  Let r be the position vector for the object, which points from the center of the circle to the object's location, and v is the velocity vector, which is tangent to the circle, and therefor perpendicular to r.

r . v = 0.

Then,
d(r . v)/dt = (dr/dt) . v + r . (dv/dt) = v . v + r . a
 
Now, a can have a radial component (parallel or anti-parallel to r, positive outward) and a tangential component (perpendicular to r): a = ar + aT, so
v . v + r . a = v2 + r . (ar + aT) = v2 + r . ar + r . aT = 0.

By definition,
r . aT = 0, so
v2 = - r . ar .

Above, ar is the positive outward radial component of the acceleration.  The dot product on the right side above must be negative for v>0.  Therefore, the acceleration points in toward the center of the circle.  Let's define aC as the centripetal (towards the center) component, positive when toward the center, such that

v2 = r aC.
Then, aC = v2/r. 
 
So, in short, an object moving about a circular path has an acceleration component that points toward the centre of the circle (centripetal) for which the magnitude is v2/r.

What causes this acceleration?  There must be some force or forces which have a net component in the direction of the centre of the circle:
Sn (Fn)C = maC = mv2/r.
Forces which act away from the centre of the circle should be assigned a negative sign in the sum.
Forces or components of forces perpendicular to the line connecting the object to the centre of the circle are referred to as tangential forces or components, for which we can write
Sn (Fn)T = maT.
The meaning of this will be clearer after a later discussion.

In lab, you did an experiment to verify the centripetal force relationship above.  The speed of a pendulum bob was measured at the lowest point in its swing, while the tension in the string was measured simultaneously with a force transducer.  Here are some results from this experiment, in which the net centripetal force is plotted against the centripetal acceleration; the slope should be the mass (0.2 kg in this trial, so the results are off by 1%):

Let's return briefly to the derivation above.  What if the speed of the object had not been constant?  Two things:
We would have had to replace the step,
s/Dt is the speed, v, of the object,
with
lim Dt->0 [Dr/Dt] = lim Dt->0 s/Dt= vinstantaneous.
Also, there would had had to have been a component of the acceleration along the direction tangent to the circular path, which we would then have called the tangential acceleration.  But, there would still have been a centripetal component as described.

One last note: occasionally, problems are given using the angular velocity, w.  This is the number of radians per second (Dq/Dt) through which the object travels about the centre of the circle.  Since the arclength is given by
s = rq,
then the tangential speed is given by
v = Ds/Dt = D[rq]/Dt = rDq/Dt = rw,
so that
aC = v2/r = w2r.


Applications and Examples of Centripetal Acceleration

Consider a bob of mass m being whirled at the end of a string in a horizontal circle of radius r at constant speed v.  What is the tension in the string if gravity is ignored?
We consider the bob at some instant in its travels and make our co-ordinate system such that one axis points toward the centre of the circle.

We consider any force pointing toward the centre to be positive and any force pointing away to be negative, and we write Newton's second law:
SnFn= maC.
T = maC = m[v2/r].
Now, what difference would it make if gravity were present?


Assume that the string makes an angle q with the horizontal.  Then,
C: SnFn= maC   =>  Tcosq = m[v2/r].
y: SnFn= may   =>  T sinq - mg = 0  =>  T sinq = mg
Combining these by dividing the second by the first, we obtain:
tanq = gr/v2,
which may be of interest in a given problem or not.
In such a case, can the string ever be exactly horizontal?

Consider a coin on a moving turntable.  What must be the minimum co-efficient of static friction (for a given speed and radius from the spindle) in order that the coin not slide off?
Align the axes so that the x-direction i stoward the centre of the circular path of the coin, and the y-direction is vertically upward.

Write Newton's second law:
SnFn= ma.
FN - mg = may = 0
Ff = max = maC = mv2/r.
Ff = mSFN (in the critical case of the coin just about to slide).
Through substitution (not shown here) and cancellation of the mass from each side in the result, we obtain:
(mS)MIN = v2/gr.
So, the mass of the coin doesn't matter (dime or half-dollar), and consistent with our experience, the coin is more likely to slide at greater speeds and at smaller radiuses.
The same results are applicable to a car driving in circles on a flat parking lot; the static friction between tires and road provide the centripetal force. If the car attempts to make a turn at too high a speed, or with too tight a radius of curvature, it will begin to skid to away from the circle's centre.

How do highway engineers minimize the necessity of friction for turning cars along bends in the road?


How does this help?  Consider the figure below.

We shall draw in the friction down the incline, parallel to the surfaces of the road and tires, keeping in mind that we can reverse the direction later by inserting the negative of the value of the co-efficient.  We shall orient the axes so that the (centripetal) acceleration is directed along the x-axis; we assume that we want the vertical acceleration to be zero.
x:  Ff cosq  + FNsinq  = maC = mv2/r
y:  FNcosq  - Ff sinq - mg = may = 0
Ff = mSFN (in the critical case)
Again, we re-arrange and substitute.  Since we haven't stated a problem yet, let's eliminate N and Ff, keeping the stuff we might be interested in like m, q, v, and r.
Substitute the friction relationship into the second equation:
FNcosq  - [mSFN]sinq - mg = 0
FN[cosq  - mSsinq] = mg
FN = mg /[cosq  - mSsinq]
Now, substitute this and the friction relationship into the first equation:
[mSFN]cosq  + FNsinq  = mv2/r
FN[mScosq  + sinq]  = mv2/r
[mg /[cosq  - mSsinq]][mScosq  + sinq]  = mv2/r
[mScosq  + sinq] /[cosq  - mSsinq]  = v2/gr.    (*)
First, we see that the mass drops out, so any result is just as valid for a VW Bug as for a big truck.  This is a good thing, otherwise, cars and trucks would each have their own roads (hey there's an idea!).
Let's see what else: in the winter, the roads can get very icy so that the co-efficient of friction drops to about zero.  At what angle should the road be banked so that cars can make it around the curve at the speed limit, even in winter?  Set mS = 0:
[sinq] /[cosq]= v2/gr
tanq= v2/gr.

Since we didn't actually ask a question about this situation, perhaps we can solve the relationship above (*) for each of the variables.  Just re-arrange:
vMAX = (gr[sinq + mScosq] /[cosq  - mSsinq])1/2.
Asking for the minimum speed means that the frictional force is reversed, so we can just replace
mS with -mS:
vMIN = (gr[sinq - mScosq] /[cosq  + mSsinq])1/2.

So then, to prevent sliding off the road (outwards):
rMIN v2/g [cosq  - mSsinq]/[sinq + mScosq ]
mS MIN = [(v2/gr)cosq - sinq]/[(v2/gr)sinq  + cosq]
and,
tan
q MIN = [(v2/gr) - mS]/[1+ mSv2/gr].




Now, suppose that we want to turn at 70 mph (=31 m/s) in a radius of a quarter mile (0.4 km) without relying at all on friction.  At what angle should we bank the road?

On that same curve, what maximum speed could we have and not skid off the road, if mS between rubber and concrete is 0.9?

Snide comments aside, what exactly does a spoiler do?

Why does that help?

What is the minimum speed at which this turn could be negotiated?


Why did that happen?

Mastery Question

Consider a hoop which rotates at speed w about its vertical diameter.  A bead of mass m can slide frictionlessly along the wire.
a) Find all positions on the wire at which the bead is in equilibrium, as a function of the angle between the bead and the lower-most point on the hoop, as seen from the centre of the loop.
b) Show that there is a critical value of w such that the behavior of the bead is different for w<wCthan for w>wC.
Click here for Solution.


Return to Notes Directory
Continue to Next Section of Notes

D Baum 2000